ताज्या घडामोडी - भाग २१

मग यापुढे या विषयावर न बोलणंच बरं. धन्यवाद.

बहुदा संपुआ हवे रालोआच्या जागी.

जाणत्या राजाचे मतांसाठी अकलेचे तारे तोडणे. सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाने निस्संदिग्धपणे सांगितले आहे कि तीन तलाक ला कुराणात कोठेही आधार नाही. Justice Joseph said what cannot be true in theology cannot be protected by law. He added that triple talaq is not recognised by Koran and hence it couldn't be a practice to be protected under the right to religion. The bench had asked All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) why a "custom which is theologically sinful"+ was "part of the practice of a community". "Testing the validity of customs and practices of a community is a slippery slope into which the Supreme Court must not venture," said the board's lawyer Kapil Sibal. Opponents of the practice pointed out that triple talaq was not permitted even in several Muslim countries. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-bars-triple-talaq-for-6-months-until-parliament-legislates-on-issue/articleshow/60170130.cms Chief Justice Khehar And Justice Abdul Nazeer [Minority Judgment- written By Justice Khehar] In view of the position expressed above, we are satisfied, that this is a case which presents a situation where this Court should exercise its discretion to issue appropriate directions under Article 142 of the Constitution. We therefore hereby direct, the Union of India to consider appropriate legislation, particularly with reference to ‘talaq-e-biddat’. We hope and expect, that the contemplated legislation will also take into consideration advances in Muslim ‘personal law’ – ‘Shariat’, as have been corrected by legislation the world over, even by theocratic Islamic States. When the British rulers in India provided succor to Muslims by legislation, and when remedial measures have been adopted by the Muslim world, we find no reason, for an independent India, to lag behind. Measures have been adopted for other religious denominations (see at IX – Reforms to ‘personal law’ in India), even in India, but not for the Muslims. We would therefore implore the legislature, to bestow its thoughtful consideration, to this issue of paramount importance. We would also beseech different political parties to keep their individual political gains aapart, while considering the necessary measures requiring legislation. Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court-said-triple-talaq-judgment-read-judgment/.. कुठेही न्यायालयाने किंवा मुस्लिम वैयक्तिक कायदा मंडळाने किंवा त्यांच्या वकिलानेही (कपिल सिब्बल) म्हटलेले नाही कि तीन तलाकला कुराणाचा आधार आहे. पाचच्या पाच न्यायाधीशांनी कुराणात याला आधार नाही असे स्पष्टपणे लिहिले आहे. पवार साहेबांचे लांगुलचालन इतके खाली घसरेल असे वाटले नव्हते. शरम वाटेल इतकी खालची पातळी आली आहे विनाशकाले विपरीत बुद्धी जायते नोत्तमानाम हेच खरे

भारतात मोगलाई नाहीये हे नम्रपणे नमूद करू इच्छितो!

जिथे इलेक्शनं नव्हती त्या राज्यानीही बंदी घातली होती ना ? सगळे भाजपी राज्येच होती ना ?

हा सेटलमेंट साठी संकेतशब्द असावा तर्क सुलभ माहीती गार नाखु

जेंडर डिस्क्रीमिनेशन हा मुद्दा धर्म जात यापलीकडला आहे.